Loading…

Loading grant details…

Active STUDENTSHIP UKRI Gateway to Research

The field of senses and the senses over the field Rethinking Lawscapes for Constitutional land-disputes in Brazil


Funder Arts and Humanities Research Council
Recipient Organization Queen Mary University of London
Country United Kingdom
Start Date Sep 30, 2024
End Date Sep 29, 2027
Duration 1,094 days
Number of Grantees 2
Roles Student; Supervisor
Data Source UKRI Gateway to Research
Grant ID 2927515
Grant Description

Since colonial times, land expropriation and concentration in Brazil have been the most significant contributors to social inequality and epistemic coloniality.

While some marginalized communities fight for the right to occupy territories and regulate them according to their own epistemologies, the agribusiness monoculture advances continuously in rural areas contributing to violence in the countryside and to the destruction of the environment.

For the sake of competence, the Brazilian Supreme Court is responsible for several of the country most critical land dispute cases.

When judges interpret legal conflicts around issues such as property rights, contractual relations, or possible uses of natural resources, they constantly imagine and represent the spaces reached by laws.

In that sense, spaces are for legal decisions not as static/ontological realities but, instead, active, dynamic compositions between the Law, physical places, and social interactions, a set of economic and power relations - meaning, lawscapes.

The imaginaries over spaces, however, are not randomly built in the process of individual dreaming, but are part of social discourses, social imaginaries which, therefore, can be traced through legal discourse analysis.

Following this idea, this work seeks to delve into three main question: i) First, through a methodology of rhetorical analysis applied to old cases judged the Brazilian Supreme Court, investigate if, in complicity with the liberal tradition, this court follows the tendency to "de-spatialize law". ii) Second, analyse what could be the effects of this supposedly neutral/apolitical imaginary over spaces for future land dispute cases resolutions? iii) Third, understand if a practice of critical map-making produced in the field with Landless Workers representatives could be possibly used as visual -and performative - advocacy resource to build new conceptions of space (meaning speculative narratives) - within this court.

All Grantees

Queen Mary University of London

Advertisement
Discover thousands of grant opportunities
Advertisement
Browse Grants on GrantFunds
Interested in applying for this grant?

Complete our application form to express your interest and we'll guide you through the process.

Apply for This Grant